Tuesday, November 17, 2009
retreat
Heath took pictures and made them into a cool YouTube movie. You can see it here: Wheatland Mission Retreat Video
(I have waited several days to post this entry hoping Heath would make the edits he wanted to the video, but I have decided I can't wait any longer. So I'm sorry if some of the heads are still cut off.)
Sunday, November 08, 2009
It worked. It really helped. The people in the group we were placed in weren't like our soul-mates of friendship or anything, we didn't click with them on every level, but they were Christ to us at times when we really needed it, and they gave us an opportunity to be Christ to them at other times. Which is what we really needed. The women's study I signed up for made me feel like I was not alone, like my experience was valid and worthwhile and important, even, and gave me support and the opportunity to offer support. Which is so important for the human experience, in my opinion.
After a year, we moved a couple of miles south. The megachurch was now 7 miles away instead of 5, 30 minutes instead of 20. It started to seem like a long way to drive several times a week, as silly as that may seem. We also started to read some things and talk about some ideas that were not really promoted in mainstream evangelical churches, and so we were drifting away from some of the ideology at said megachurch. So all this led up to us visiting WM on the spur-of-the-moment (which is how we do everything if you haven't figured that out yet). And we've been attending there ever since.
We have clicked with people at WM. We have loved people there. It has been a refuge that too few people with our frame of thought have.
When we first attended WM, I asked about women's groups. I was just finishing another study at the megachurch, but wanted to get involved in something at WM so I would know the people there better. Yes, I discovered, there was a group that I could join in the fall. After attending a little while, we also asked about becoming a part of a small group that met throughout the week. So we started attending that as well. We need those connections. Whenever we think we don't, and we neglect them for a while, we wither.
Well, it's been over three years that we've attended WM now. The women's group dissolved a while ago, and our small group hardly met all summer and only a few times since school started. I've tried to schedule times to get together with individuals I felt I knew the best from those groups at other times, since the regular group wasn't meeting, but I've had very little luck. And now I'm withering again. So what do I do?
We go to a small church now, because we want to go to a small church. We didn't like the fact that we could go to a church service and see over a thousand people we didn't know and not speak an authentic, meaningful word to anyone, and go back home. I might as well have listened to a radio sermon and sang to worship music on my ipod during that time. But in a small church, if everyone else's lives are stuffed too full for relationships and connectedness, and that is what you need, then what do you do?
I don't think I need to worry about offending anyone from WM with what I write on here because I don't think any of them actually read my blog anymore. (Well, and I don't actually think I wrote anything too offensive.) I guess I should be twittering or facebooking or something instead if I want people to see it. A smaller audience is actually kind of freeing, though, so I don't think I'll go that route.
Anyway - even though it is a small church, I guess I need to expand my boundaries beyond those I initially connected with to the others in the congregation, and see if anyone else still needs connectedness and doesn't have their lives stuffed too full to add anything else. Maybe I need to try to start my own women's group and see if anyone's interested.
And hey, pain only makes your art better, doesn't it? If I'm too happy, I can never write like I want to. And that is why it is hard to keep artistic crazy people on their meds. But that is another blog entry.
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
kids update
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
How much?
how to go natural?
So apparently my thing lately is shallow blog entries. I'll eventually post something more important than this again. Men, you are not going to care about this at all, so you can stop reading here. :-)
I can't remember why I started coloring my hair. I guess I wanted it a little bit lighter than it was at some point? At any rate, now I have to keep doing it, but I want to start using something as close to my natural color as possible so that maybe I can stop using it after another one or two boxes. But I am hopeless at matching the color on the box to the color on my head.
Here is a picture with a good shot of my natural hair color. (Except I know lighting can make a big difference, so who knows.) I had stopped coloring while I was pregnant with Ethan, and cut it short, so I don't think there is any color on it here. So what is it - a cool tone, a warm tone, or what they call "natural" on the boxes? There are all these terms and variations among the brands, and I stood in the aisle just staring at them all for a long time the other day. Maybe some of you that read this are more savvy about hair color than me? I have used Feria "Champagne Cocktail" the last few times, but it doesn't come out looking just like my natural color, not on the roots anyway. But maybe that is because my roots are naturally going to be darker than the lengths, not uniform. Maybe that is all that makes it look unnatural, and the solution would be to not do all over color, just some highlights on the roots or something?
Edit: I guess I am not totally opposed to continuing to color except that I use the most expensive do-it-yourself coloring brand. Maybe I just need to know what color to use in a cheaper brand, if the cheaper brands are going to work as well as Feria. I've always been afraid to use something cheap on my hair because it's long and the damage would be there for a long time.
Monday, September 14, 2009
wondering
I've been wondering this ever since we chose the doctors we currently have. We go to the same clinic, but to two separate doctors - Heath to a male and the kids and I to a female. They aren't even in the same group within the clinic - each group/office being a separate wing of the building. I suppose there is nothing particularly wrong with our current doctors, nothing significant, anyway. My doctor does seem like she has just had a pot of coffee each time I see her, but some people are just like that, I think. I can't point to a time that she has brushed me off or not taken time for my questions, but she is always moving and talking very quickly - sort of like a little hummingbird. (She is small, too, so the comparison really fits.) Heath hasn't had anything bad to say about his doctor, but he hasn't had anything good to say, either. No strong feelings either way, I guess.
But it just isn't the same as the whole family going to Dr. Koksal, back in Garden City. He knew our whole family. His nursing staff knew our whole family. He actually had a nurse, not an MA. He had been practicing medicine my entire life and had a confident, reassuring demeanor that I believe was warranted. He took me through two pre-eclamptic pregnancies and all the shots and baby sicknesses of our first two boys. I loved it that I could walk to Dr. Koksal's office from our house in GC, if I had wanted, then to the hospital from there, if I had wanted; that when he admitted me for my deliveries, he was able and willing to drop in and check on me after clinic hours, and able to be at my bedside almost immediately when it was time to deliver. With Jacob's delivery, I remember seeing him walk in and quickly put on his garb, and it seemed like they had just told me it was time to deliver a minute or two before. They were still getting everything else in the room ready when he got there.
So at any rate, we haven't been able to find anyone we are similarly attached to here, and we won't find a similar situation. I had to wait to push for 30 minutes when Samuel was ready to be delivered because the doctor couldn't be there any quicker, and that is just how it will be in a larger city. Still, I wonder if we might find a situation a bit closer to what we liked back there.
I'd like to find a doctor that the whole family can go to, so he actually knows us as a unit. I'd rather not do women's exams with a male doctor, but Heath doesn't want to do men's exams with a female doctor. So whaddaya do. Dr. Koksal had been practicing medicine long enough to have delivered some of our friends as babies (Betsy, I think?), so somehow it was not a problem for me that he was male. I have a feeling if we are going to find one doctor for the whole family, it's going to have to be a man. It would be nice, if I have to do women's exams with a male doctor, if he could also deliver any future babies we might have. But family doctors who deliver babies seem to be rare in this area.
There is also the distance issue. Our current clinic is about 6 miles away from our house, about 2.5 miles from Heath's office. There is another clinic about a mile from our house. We actually started out there when we first moved here, but within a few months they had dropped our insurance plan so we had to switch to the place we are now. I'd like to try it again - I think - because it is so much closer and maybe we could start over with one doctor for the whole family. But then I am nervous about them possibly dropping our insurance plan again, or us realizing that we don't like it any more than our other clinic and wishing we had stayed where we were more familiar. My doctor and her staff are beginning to recognize the boys and I, at least. We'd have to start that process all over somewhere else.
What to do, what to do? I need to decide quickly because I am due for a physical, and there are certain very important prescriptions I can't get filled until I make an appointment.
If you have read this far, thank you. I know that was a lot of boring detail. If you have any advice, I'd appreciate it!
Friday, September 11, 2009
plans
Right now I only have one extra child I am caring for. I purposefully didn't advertise my openings until just a couple of days ago, because I wanted to have a light load during the last couple of weeks before school started. Part of me thinks I should have waited to start day care until my big boys started school. This summer, having them home and doing day care, was harder than I thought. Yet, I don't know if I could have done anything more for/with them had I not had day care children here. I still couldn't have taken them to the pool for long periods of time every day, unless they wanted to stay in the baby pool with Samuel and I the entire time, since I can't keep all three of them safe by myself in the deeper water. And I don't think I could have done any more to manage their fighting without day care kids here. At least caring for day care kids reassured me that I was still doing something well, despite being unable to prevent or control my big boys' fighting at times. How can they love and rely on each other so much and still torture each other the way they do? Having breaks from each other now that school has started certainly helps their relationship and my tension level.
Work and money are funny things sometimes. I read an Amish fictional book recently, as I do from time to time, and I was reminded of how much our work can make us feel important or unimportant, powerful or powerless. The Amish purposefully chose jobs that keep them humble. They don't educate their children beyond 8th grade because there is no job in the Amish life that requires higher education, and they believe that higher education would only serve to make members of their community proud and elitist. It is an interesting thing to ponder, I think - how much we choose our jobs because of the importance and power they confer, or how much we choose them simply to provide for ourselves and our families. I don't want to be poor -- I don't think any of us does, really, just for the sake of being poor, although some choose it to draw closer to God. I think providing for our family is the main reason Heath and I work, and in the fields that we do. But the element of gaining prestige or significance from one's work does creep in at times. However, even if we wanted to choose a very simple, humble life now, scaling down our housing, rarely eating out, getting rid of our tv service, high-speed internet (gasp!) and our iphones (gasp!), we would still have the little matter of our debts, mostly education debts. So we work to pay them off, and in the process we become accustomed to a lot of other perks. But I also get mad at the money and the work it requires, sometimes. Why do we need so much of it? Why does it seem we can't live on less? No matter how much we make, why is the debt still so hard to pay off? It shouldn't be so mysterious or difficult, but sometimes it seems like it is.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Samuel loves to go potty on the potty seat. Last night, when I changed him before bed he was completely dry after about an hour and a half in that diaper. So I asked if he wanted to go on the potty, which of course he did, and instead of just a tiny amount like the other times he has gone, it was a regular amount! I was so excited! Then, this morning he wanted to go on the potty again, but only had a little bit to pee. I put a pullup on him thinking I would let him try again later. But before we could try again, he came to me without the pullup on, holding a wet wipe and trying to wipe his own bottom but needing help. I found the pullup discarded with the poop in it, but Samuel had run in to sit on the potty seat before I could wrestle him onto the changing table to get cleaned up. I let him sit there for a bit, dumped the poop from his pullup into the potty so he could flush it, cleaned him and toilet seat up. Then I decided to put underwear on him to see if maybe he is actually ready to be trained. (I don't think putting them in pullups is really effective for serious potty training, just for letting them gain some familiarity with the process before they are really ready to start going on the potty consistently.) He didn't want the plain white underwear on because his pullup was cooler. But then I got out the Spiderman underwear. He said, almost reverently, "Spidey!" and eagerly put them on.
Unfortunately, he wet in that pair fairly quickly. But he was immediately concerned and told me about it. (Some kids are oblivious and will continue to run around wet until you find the puddle.) He sat on the potty to see if he could go any more, then we found a pair of Cars underwear for him. I have a timer set to put him on the potty again. I know it is really early for this, but he seems to want to learn if possible. I'll let you know how it goes!

Friday, July 31, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
our vacation - part one
The first three nights, we stayed at the Westin Imagine Orlando, a four star hotel which we were fortunate enough to get for half price on priceline.com. The hotel is specifically designed to be restful, from the “Heavenly Bed” and “Heavenly Shower” to the signature scent – white tea and aloe - that is in the lobby as well as in the “Heavenly Spa” toiletries provided in the bathroom. The room we stayed in has a king size bed and kitchenette (the rooms with two queen size beds do not have the kitchenette). The "Heavenly Bed" consists of a thick pillow top mattress covered with high quality sheets, a light down comforter, another flat sheet on top of that, and finally a fluffy fiber-fill comforter. There were four thick feather pillows, two long king size and two regular size for each of us, plus a long bolster pillow. The “Heavenly Shower” consists of two shower heads, one above the other, each with a choice of massage or regular spray. The rooms are decorated in sage, aqua, ecru, and beige – again, designed to be restful. The kitchenette has a sink, microwave, small fridge, and cabinets and drawers equipped with a few essential dishes, utensils, and small appliances. We certainly enjoyed having access to it for our late night bowls of cereal and chilled pop and frappaucinos. The counter and furniture tops are all a solid surface and the bathroom floor and shower walls are tiled. The hotel has a nice pool surrounded by padded lounge chairs, big umbrellas, and glass-top tables, with a poolside bar offering outrageously priced drinks. (Heath thoroughly enjoyed two $10 margaritas.) I had forgotten how relaxing it could be to float in the water, simply to relax and cool off, with no one else to watch over. Finally, the hotel has valet parking, which I thought was silly at first, but a necessary expense in order to stay here, but which turned out to be a luxury we have really enjoyed.
Our meals were wonderful. We looked up restaurants ahead of time, to see what other travelers rated as their top picks. Le Coq au Vin is a small French place, not very busy for our Friday late lunch, but absolutely delicious. Heath had a corn and crab chowder that was very smooth and buttery – it tasted like comfort feels. I had rabbit for the first time, which was covered in a lovely prune sauce and served with fresh green beans and carrots and macaroni and cheese unlike any macaroni and cheese I'd had before. The cheese was something rich and textured and the sauce was accented with some kind of spice or small vegetables – I couldn't tell exactly what. Heath had the coq au vin, which was also covered in a wonderful sauce and served with the fresh green beans and carrots, but with egg noodles instead of macaroni. His sauce was more like a rich, wine-flavored, thin brown gravy, whereas mine was a bit thicker and sweeter. We shared a glass of the house Cabernet Sauvignon, which was quite good. It was from a winery in France whose name escapes me, nothing I'd heard of before. If we lived in Orlando, I could see this becoming our favorite date restaurant. As we left, we read the signed pictures and plaques from congressmen and Presidents for whom the chef had cooked, and made note of the many awards the restaurant had received.
For dinner Friday, we went to Roy's, a Hawaiian restaurant. We had a sushi roll to start, which was wrapped in salmon and some other kind of fish and had spicy tuna in the middle. There was also rice coating the outside of the roll and thin slices of avocado on top. It was quite interesting and not what I expected. I can see how you could develop a taste for sushi, but I don't see myself going out of my way to have it again. I am glad we tried one of their sushi rolls, though, since I think I would have regretted it if we hadn't. They also served complimentary steamed edame with a special seasoning sprinkled on it, like other restaurants would serve bread before your meal. It was crunchy and sort of addictive, cracking open the shells like peanuts and popping the beans into one's mouth. For our meal, I had salmon coated with some sort of cheese – I can't remember what it was called now - served with barley accented with almonds and a mustard vinaigrette on the side. Heath had the hibachi-grilled salmon, which had a sweet soy sauce mixture on it, and was served with a strange little cake of white rice, shaped into a triangle and rolled on the outside edges in some spices. There were also thinly sliced cucumbers and carrots in some sort of vinaigrette served with his salmon. It was all very good and very unique. Not a place we would want to go all the time since it was just so strange and different to us, and pretty expensive, but an interesting place to go for special occasions.
For lunch Saturday, we went to a highly rated local place for sandwiches (after two rich meals in a row, I craved something light!). Pompoms Tea House and Sandwiches was small and out of the way, but the relaxed atmosphere, warm and upbeat staff, and the creative menu were just what we needed. We both had the Cobb sandwich, which was turkey with melted blue cheese, bacon, avocado, watercress, and red onions (which we both left off), on your choice of bread and pressed like a panini sandwich, only without the grill lines. Very tasty and filling, and also very affordable. I had the Chai, which included free refills, much to my surprise. Heath tried a local beer, Orange Blossom Pilsner, which contained orange blossom honey. No beer tastes good to me, but Heath says this one was good. We admired the photos displayed on the walls from a local artist before leaving.
After another afternoon lounging by the pool, we lazily got around and decided to pick a top rated Italian restaurant for dinner Saturday evening. Magianno's Little Italy was the best Italian restaurant I have been to so far. The atmosphere was delightful – 1940's theme, with many old painting and photographs all over the walls, old music, curtains, furniture – everything the way it would have been back then. The stuffed mushroom appetizer and the Lobster ravioli were fantastic. Heath had the special, Chicken Florentine (covered in Parmesan cheese and pan fried), with creamed spinach and buttered potatoes on the side. He had the house Merlot and I had coffee with cream, both of which were quite good accompaniments to our meal.
Sunday, we checked out of the Westin and moved to the resort where Heath's conference was Sunday night through Wednesday noon. Our room at the JW Marriot was very similar to our room at the Westin - similar size and luxuries, except lacking a kitchenette and having a larger bathroom with separate shower and bath instead. But the hotel which contained our room and the conference center and grounds adjacent to it were just amazing. Grand is the word that comes to mind. Tall ceilings, floors and walls made of marble, enormous paintings on the walls, sculptures and pottery on tables, huge chandeliers, and a huge fountain in the center of the lobby. There was a golf course, lazy river swimming pool, spa, playgrounds, sand volleyball court - I'm sure I'm leaving something out. Of course, we didn't actually have time to enjoy any of that (and even if we had the time, I think we still would have spent it lying by the pool, like we did at the Westin!). It was impressive that there was access to it, though. There were also little overpriced clothing shops and salons off the lobby and even a Starbucks. We had access to, I think, six restaurants at this resort. We ate at Citron after Heath finished his session Sunday evening, because they were offering a special for attendees of his conference and the menu looked interesting. It was good food, but I think I would have preferred it not to be a buffet. It was a fancy sort of restaurant where you would not expect a buffet, and I found I didn't know what to try and what to put together for a meal. I did like getting to try all the miniature desserts, though.
I have pictures that I will download and post later. To sum it up - we basically slept and slept and laid around by the pool and read books and talked and ate at really good places. It was perfect. :-)
Friday, July 10, 2009
this week
Thursday, July 02, 2009
mulling over it
Although I experience this to be true and see the helpfulness of a strategy of consciously meeting each other's needs in order to stay "in love," it seems like there should be more than this. It seems that we should be striving for a Christ-like love that is based in a willingness to sacrifice and to submit and steeped in a trust and security that God has already met all our needs and will continue to do so - perhaps through our spouse, but in other ways if necessary. Yet, getting to a place where I can live like that is a huge challenge. So, although the flesh part of me screams "Meet my needs so it will be easier to love you!," the spirit part of me says, "I want to show love like Christ taught and modeled, by lovingly sacrificing and submitting and serving, whether or not you meet my needs."
I think the key to what I am pondering is the gap between my emotions and what I desire and have committed to do. I feel disgusted or entitled or angry in situations where I would otherwise want to act lovingly if I could see past the emotions for just a second. I suppose the only answer to my contrary emotions is inner transformation by the Holy Spirit. Yet I haven't experienced that for quite a while. There have been times in my life when I have felt and seen evidence of this sort of transformation, but not often in the toughest areas of human interaction - the relationships that are closest and most intimate in my life.
There is a truth that I first discovered in my relationship with Christ, then discovered again in the theory of cognitive therapy, then realized anew to be a scriptural principle, that what you think - what you really are convinced about deep down, spoken or unspoken - will produce corresponding emotions which will greatly influence your behavior. So I'm pretty sure the key to my struggle is that I have some beliefs that do not produce the sort of feelings that motivate loving behavior. I'm not saying that proper beliefs would cause me to always feel delighted and enamored with everyone around me, but perhaps proper beliefs would at least help to quell the feelings of anger and dislike that can occur when receiving less than ideal treatment from those around me. After all, we all realize eventually that feelings of attraction or affection or admiration or appreciation - all of which we often call love because of the loving behavior that generally accompanies them - can evaporate easily enough. But if we have committed to loving people even when they cease to meet our needs, then we need something more than these to keep us going.
I'll let you all know when I've figured out how to actually do this. ;-) I think perhaps getting adequate sleep is the first step to allowing my thoughts and deeply held beliefs to be challenged and conformed to truth. (yaaaawwwwn)
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
Where is love
The longer I live life, the more I feel like human love or fondness is not really real, not in a lasting, unconditional way. The reason I feel that way is because of my experience with my own emotions. It seems like one day, I will feel great fondness and love toward my family members, but the next day, or even just a few hours later, I won't even like them. And it seems to be primarily linked to what they are doing or not doing for me at the time. If my husband is being a "good" husband or the kids are being "good" kids, then I feel very appreciative toward them; I feel like I love them so much and can't imagine life without them. When they are not fulfilling my expectations or desires or meeting my needs, then I am frustrated or even appalled and can't seem to grasp how I felt toward them just a little while earlier.
I'm sure I'm not the only one with this experience. I may just be one of the few willing to admit it right now.
I think back on the marriage books I have read that seem to be the most successful or helpful. His Needs Her Needs - this book is about how marriages fall apart when spouses don't meet each others' needs, which are generally different for each gender. The Five Love Languages - this is about how people don't feel loved by each other unless they are showing love in ways that one another can perceive and receive it - in each other's specific love language. Love and Respect - this is about how husbands and wives have needs or desires that are different from each other, and how each should respect these differences and give in to meeting each other's needs, even if these needs seem strange or even unreasonable from the other person's perspective. Created to Be His Helpmeet - this is like just the wives' side of Love and Respect - instructions to the wife on how to be a "good" wife that does what her husband would desire.
Yes, these books work. They work because they make us into people that are pleasing to each other, and then we feel loved and loving toward each other. But you know what? It doesn't always last. Sometimes our spouses don't meet our needs. And at that point, I don't think most of us feel very loved or loving. We feel like our we live with people that are ultimately selfish and difficult to live with. As we all indeed are.
So where is love??? The New Testament teaches us that love is manifest as sacrifice. I think this is definitely true, and it is the part of a relationship, whether marriage, family, or friendship, that makes it an image of relationship with God. But the trouble is, we are very imperfect in our ability to sacrifice. I have human, physical limitations that prevent me from always giving my friends and family members what they need, and apparently so do they.
I honestly think sometimes that life would be much simpler without any relationships. If I had gone off to live in the woods alone or something like that, I think I would never get hurt. It would surely be much easier to "love" from afar. Because as long as I have relationships, then I have expectations of those relationships, and whenever those expectations are not met, then I don't feel loving toward those I should love. I don't think we realize what a challenge "Love your enemies" is from Jesus. Often our "enemies," those opposing us, are at other times our loved ones.
I want to be able to draw on God's love to love those around me, to have His Spirit make His love real to those around me by producing Godly characteristics in me, i.e. the fruit of the Spirit. But I have found lately - as in the last few years - that to be very, very difficult to experience on a consistent basis. My own emotions and self-protective impulses seem to overwhelm whatever good intentions I have ever had. I guess I have a lot of growing to do in the area of trusting God, so I can be less self-protective and determined to make sure my needs get met. Then maybe I'll realize what lasting love toward others feels like, and be able to experience it from others as well.
Friday, June 05, 2009
Happy Birthday, Samuel!
Thursday, June 04, 2009
just an update
Monday, May 18, 2009
photo shoot
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
comparisons



Tuesday, April 21, 2009
update (read post before this one first)
Wow. Pretty crazy. I could really be doing this soon!
Jenny's Day Care
Yes, I know, I get frustrated with my own number of kids sometimes, right? So why add to that? Well....
1) Having the boys' friends over here a lot this year has shown me that a larger group of kids, particularly kids that are not your own, are not difficult in the same way as caring for your own children at home all day. Other people's kids don't challenge you or test you the same way that kids will challenge and test a parent. (One would hope. At least most of the time.) Also, when the kids are not all your own, and several are about the same age, chances are they will play together nicely, rather than torturing each other all day like siblings often do. They may even distract the sibilings in the group from torturing each other. Granted, a larger group is difficult in other ways, like preparing more food and supervising crafts or projects for a larger number of children. With my little bit of experience with it, it seems to be more physically challenging but less psychologically/emotionally challenging. If you have experience with this and can correct me, feel free.
2) Ethan is going to all-day Kindergarten in the fall. So, Samuel will be my only child at home for the majority of the day. I have been past the continually-overwhelmed-adjusting-to-having-three-kids-and-taking-care-of-a-baby-again stage for a while, and in the fall the easing up of the pressure will be even more noticeable. So, as usual, I need to find something to fill in the space and stretch myself. That is not entirely true, but the point is that for the first time since I've been home with the kids, I can actually envision being able to devote some energy to something other than caring for my own kids and household. Also, Heath knows that he will have to share the housework with me if I do this, or so he says - and I am holding him to it. It won't be an option not to help, I don't think, since we will have to keep the house up to a certain standard in order to do day care. So, each evening we'll have to get certain things up to spec so we can be ready for the next day, and I don't *think* he'll let me do it all while he watches TV or lies on the couch.
3) We really want to pay off our debt quickly. We looked at all the options for me bringing in some income, and seeing as I don't really want to leave Samuel with someone for more than a few hours a week, and I don't have any highly paying skills, and certainly not ones that I could make money with from home or in just a few hours a week... opening a home day care rose to the top as the clear choice. I do love and enjoy kids, and I have been spending the last six years gaining experience at caring for them. Plus, I have family members who do it and can save me from having to learn everything the hard way. Watching them both encourages me and challenges me, since they do such a good job at it. Heath and I both know going into it that it will be hard work, but we want to take it on, and we want to do it well.
4) If I find it is too challenging, I could always hire someone, probably a teenage girl, to come in and help me for a certain number of hours each week. This would slow down paying off the debt, but I would still make enough to justify doing it.
So, anyway, we are planning on starting this summer. Sometimes I think we should wait until the school year begins, so I don't have both my big boys home all day in the beginning, but then I think, I can just start with a few kids this summer if need be. I will be allowed to have up to five children other than Samuel who are not yet school age. I can also have up to four school age children, depending on how many of the other children are under 18 months. I have considered not taking any children younger than Samuel, but on the other hand I love, love, love little ones. It is my favorite stage. They need a lot of attention, but they sleep a lot, too. My two big boys will fill the school age slots, and possibly their neighbor friends will, too - I'm not sure how that will work out this summer. Right now the boys go back and forth between the two houses quite a bit, and of course we don't charge for any time that they are here. I don't want to fill the other two school age slots, partly because I just don't particularly want to, but also because I want our boys to be free to have their friends over to play. Feel free to weigh in on when you think I should start and what ages I should take.
Heath has created a wonderful website for me: www.jennyskids.com It's not totally finished, but most of the info is there. It introduces me, for those who don't know me, and it tells what our day care will be like. Like I said, we won't be starting until the end of this school year - I am still waiting for the state surveyor to come out and inspect our home to see that is complies with all the numerous regulations. But, if you know anyone who needs a good day care home in the southeast part of town, feel free to refer them to me and to my website!
Thursday, April 16, 2009
potty break
Just now I thought I heard Jacob's door open, so I went to check, and sure enough the door was open and Jacob had moved to Ethan's bed. (He was sort of lying next to Ethan cuddling him, but mostly splayed out on top of him.) I said, "Jacob, did you go pee? Jacob? Jacob? Did you go pee? Did you wet your bed?" I checked the bed, and no, thankfully it was dry. On my way to go check the hallway bathroom I notice that Samuel's light is on, and he's crying. I open the door, and there in the corner of the rocking chair in Samuel's room is a puddle.
Jacob obviously thought he was in the bathroom. He did this before in our bedroom - walked in to the spot where the toilet would be, if it was the bathroom, and casually let go and peed on our floor. Then he went back to bed, completely unresponsive to us the whole time.
Well, at least he isn't wetting the bed anymore.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
personalities
Unlike Betsy, my personality profile hasn't changed. The description of the INFP from personalitypage.com describes me really well, with just a few things that are off because I am not purely "P"erceiving, and at times lean toward "J"udging. Here are some of the descriptions that I thought were particularly true of me: (I wanted to just copy the quotes from the article, but apparently that is illegal?)
INFP's are seeking meaning in life, purpose, truth, connections.
INFP's are idealists and perfectionists. They usually have very high standards and are hard on themselves. They may have trouble working with a group because others' standards aren't as high, or it is hard for them not to be in control. Their idealism and perfectionism can paralyze them if they don't learn to balance it with reality.
INFPs are intuitive. They especially use their intuition to guide them about people.
INFP's are generally thoughtful and considerate. They care deeply about people and are genuinely interested in them; they are good at listening and putting people at ease. However, they usually are not able to express their deep caring very well verbally and are awkward and uncomfortable when they try. Instead, they are often good writers and are able to define and express their feelings very well in written form.
INFPs hate conflict because of their focus on feelings. Conflict makes them feel terrible, and they can only focus on the fact that they don't want to feel terrible. Because conflict is so upsetting to INFPs, they are often illogical and irrational in conflict situations; they may have outbursts in which they throw out fact after fact which are not logically true. In contrast to this personal difficulty with conflict, INFPs are often able to help others work out their differences because of their intuitive understanding of other people's perspectives and feelings and their genuine care for others and desire to help them.
INFP's projects or interests can become a "cause" for them. Although they are not detail-oriented generally, they will cover every possible detail for the cause they are interested in and will become passionate about it.
You can see the entire description at personalitypage.com/INFP.html. The stuff about conflict seems especially true to me (and Heath agreed a little too enthusiastically). It's funny to see someone write a definition of a personality type that describes even the parts of my personality that I have always thought didn't go together. I really care a lot about people, so why can't I express it to them in person? And why can't I handle conflict calmly and gracefully with those same people I care so much about? I am such an idealist and perfectionist, in theory and in specific areas I become obsessed about, but overall I am not good at making sure everything gets done (does this fall under "not detail oriented"?). Well, apparently it's a whole group of people who are like me. Who knew?
P.S. - I would LOVE to hear what personality type you are and what about the description fits you the most. :-)
Friday, March 06, 2009
lost and found
You will not believe this.
Jacob just came home from school. He rode home with his friend Ethan H., like usual. Both boys came storming in the door, like usual, but today they had a special guest with them - our dog, Mason!
I was stunned. I didn't even realize Mason had gotten out. We'd been in and out of the house all day, enjoying the beautiful weather, and earlier he was playing in the backyard barking at the neighbor dogs. He must have found a hole in the fence, or maybe he slipped out the front door or garage door when I wasn't looking - he can push the front glass door open if it isn't completely latched.
But how in the world did he find the school, and on top of that, how did he find Jacob out of the 400 kids that were leaving the school? He's ridden with me to pick up Jacob a few times, but not recently, and you have to follow a maze of curving and intersecting streets to find the school. Nonetheless, Ethan H.'s Dad said Mason was sitting at Jacob's feet when he pulled up to pick up the boys. And thank goodness, he managed to find the school and Jacob without getting hit by any of the cars racing toward the school to pick up kids.
We are doubly lucky to have found him this way this time because I had just taken off his collar with his ID tag on it for a bath last night. We take it off very rarely because of one other time he got loose without it. We had to plaster the neighborhood with lost dog signs and wait seemingly forever for a call. If he gets out with his ID tag on, someone usually brings him by or calls us right away. I put his collar back on now, but the ID tag is missing! We will have to go get a replacement right away. He's too good of a dog to just lose.
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Nevertheless, I have started several blog entries, but never finished editing them so they could be posted. Maybe I hadn't sufficiently processed those thoughts, or they didn't need to be shared right now (or possibly ever). At any rate, I have been processing thoughts during this time - just not able to verbalize a lot of it in a way that satisfies me yet.
Some news for those of you who don't see me every week or so: The boys are great. Jacob is still doing well in school and enjoying it. His reading still amazes me. One day it seemed to just come together for him, and then his reading vocabulary grew exponentially over the next few weeks and continues to steadily grow at a satisfying rate. It is wonderful to see him want to read, to stretch himself, to enjoy practicing, to seek out more, and especially, to bless those around him with his skills (I am thinking mainly of his two little brothers who love to be read to). He is tall and solid and strong - he has made a goal of conquering the playground equipment at his school, not just playing on it. One by one he conquered the various sets of monkey bars and rings, and now he and his friends dare each other and cheer each other on in completing various tricks on them, like hanging upside down. They have a scoring system for their acrobatic feats, and I had to suppress a laugh when Jacob announced that he had gotten to "Super Rainbow" level. Hah! Such tough boys, but still not aware of which things are supposedly feminine.
Ethan just turned five. I can hardly believe it! He is growing taller and looking more and more like a school-age boy instead of a preschooler. He plays pretend all day long, especially Spiderman, Star Wars, Transformers - any strong, fighting characters he hears about. He loves to be with his friends and his brothers, although he is still quite attached to me and wants to cuddle and have me play with his hair or rub his back anytime the opportunity arises. (Of course, Jacob still likes to cuddle, too, but only at certain times and much less overall than Ethan. Ethan has always been our more physically affectionate one, though.) He has gotten to the stage of asking questions, being more curious and wanting to know the answers. He didn't do this as early as Jacob, but I think it was because previously Jacob was asking all the questions for him. When he was younger, he probably didn't understand all the questions and answers, but as he grew he would have started to take it in, and it was probably enough information to satisfy his own curiosity vicariously. Now that Jacob is in school all day, and Ethan continues to grow in his understanding and perspective of the world around him, he has started to ask his own questions. I absolutely love it. That is one part of being a mom that I wouldn't trade for anything. He is also a physically strong and healthy little boy, like his brothers. He too likes to play outside and test his skills in our backyard and on the playground, but it is less of a focus in his life than it is in Jacob's.
Samuel continues to be an absolute delight. He is almost 21 months now. He is so soft and squishy and round - round cheeks, round belly, round bottom. He wants to do and have everything his big brothers do and have. He gets as excited to see them as he does to see us. He tries to wrestle with them just as rough and long as they can handle and will even initiate the wrestling himself (which can be a problem if his targets aren't ready to be wrestled). He doesn't say much intelligible yet, but the third time around I'm not freaking out - our other boys didn't speak much at this age either. He loves me with abandon, but perhaps I only notice his intensity because it is contrasted by my bigger boys gradually being more independent and not as transparent with their devotion. I am just as enamored with him as he is with me, of course - as I have been with each of my boys.
As for my life of late, I would say overall things have been going fairly well. I have had struggles, as always seems to be the case - difficulty with the boys (although you wouldn't know it from my glowing descriptions above :-) ), difficulty thriving in my role/position, difficulty processing and understanding the questions that come to my mind and heart sometimes, and difficulty dealing with my own weaknesses and limitations. Like I said above, I've been processing these things. Sometimes the process seems too slow to bear; other times I can see growth, and I am encouraged. Maybe I can write more about that later. For now, I think I will leave this entry as mostly an update on the boys, so that I can ensure it actually gets posted. Oh, and here are some pictures from Ethan's fifth birthday party, in case you haven't seen them on my Facebook page yet:
Friday, January 09, 2009
I've been meaning to post this for a while...

Two four-year-old little boys giving fake smiles for a picture...
Can you believe how much they look alike?!? The ears and the hair are different, and though you can't see it in this picture, their bodies are built differently as well. But I think we can predict with some pretty good accuracy what Ethan's face will look like in 26 years. :-)
I forgive
Before this conversation, I was speaking with another group of friends. It has been a good day for discussions with friends for me. Within this group, we were discussing hurts that occur in the Church. The irony is, despite me sharing my particular version of the Church hurting me, I didn't realize at the time how hypocritical it was - that I still do not have grace for the person who hurt me there - despite the fact that he is human, just like me; despite the fact that his offense, his insult to me was so much less than those I've received from others who I have forgiven and forgotten.
So here it is: I forgive you. I forgive you for saying I was an aggressive, hot-tempered person, or something to that effect, anyway. I forgive you for denying my husband a job because of something I had said. I forgive you for choosing not to include my family, for ignoring, not noticing us and setting us aside. I forgive you for judging us to be something that I firmly believe we are not. I let you go - I release you. It's okay - You're human just like me. Sometimes you misjudge. Sometimes you slip up; sometimes you overlook; sometimes perhaps you are even exclusive and self-protective.
Why can't we truly forgive each other, even seventy times seven; even when we know it to be the most powerful, life-giving, and transformative thing available to us? Why couldn't I truly forgive for so long? How did I deceive myself into thinking I already had, when my heart hadn't really let go?
This is who we are: We are not the pattern of the world - driven by self-preservation, self-focus, pride, the lust of the flesh. We are transformed - empowered by selfless love - loving even our enemies, forgiving each other, bearing each other's burdens, taking care of each other even when it hurts. (Romans 12:2)
It is hard not to be disheartened when I see unresolved conflict and hurt feelings between believers. But even when I don't see the community of forgiveness and selfless love that I believe God desires us to be, I will keep believing for it. Because now I realize: Sometimes God's solution is not the obvious one. Sometimes the change of heart, the realizations, the actions and words that need to happen come slowly, more slowly than we think we can stand. But I will try to wait patiently for God to work out the hurts we believers inflict on each other, remembering that often he is working in scarred hearts like mine.
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Captain Destructo strikes again


Tuesday, December 02, 2008
new...
(That sounds like a flippant way to talk about the Church and God's Work, but hopefully you know what I mean.)
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
sales pressure woes
Friday, November 14, 2008
please vote in my poll
Friday, November 07, 2008
friends
Well, Jacob's friendship with the neighbor boy, who we call Ethan H. in order to distinguish from our Ethan (yes, it is confusing), has been a double blessing in that Ethan H. has a little brother, Aiden, who is 4, just like our Ethan. At first, our Ethan would only go over to their house with Jacob after school and seemed to be more interested in what the big boys were doing (i.e. cool video games) than what Aiden was playing. But gradually Ethan and Aiden have developed their own friendship, and now Ethan wants to have Aiden come over during the day. It has worked out splendidly. I feel like it's mini-preschool for him, a chance to socialize and learn to get along with others his own age, minus circle time. He is no longer nagging me or sitting in front of a screen; he is outside hunting monsters or rediscovering his toys in the playroom through the fresh eyes of his friend. It is a really a huge blessing. I feel like God has met our need in a way that I could not have anticipated and in a way that I am actually more pleased with than I would have been with taking him to preschool, I think.
Here are a couple of pictures of them being silly today. Notice the weapons they carry, which are vital to backyard adventures, where droids or monsters may need to be killed at any second.

Thursday, November 06, 2008
night terrors
He hadn't had one for quite a while - months, I'd say, or has it even been a year? - until this week. If you aren't familiar with night terrors, let me explain. A night terror is not a bad dream. There is no waking up and discussing the dream and being comforted. In fact, the person experiencing it doesn't even remember it the next morning and is usually impossible to awaken. Rather, it is more related to sleep walking and other sleep disorders than it is to nightmares. It begins with the child waking up screaming. You go in to comfort the child but are completely unable to comfort him, and in fact, your touches may provoke more screaming and writhing. So, realizing it is a night terror, you wait it out, watching over the child to make sure he doesn't hurt himself. After a while, he calms down, usually abruptly. He is peacefully back asleep, while your nerves are rattled and shaken.
It seems that Jacob's night terrors are often triggered by his allergies and asthma. It seems that if he doesn't have full capacity to breathe, when he slips into a deep sleep he awakens screaming. For a while, when he would frequently awaken screaming, we knew it meant one of two things - he needed to pee and was painfully holding it but unable to wake up enough to get to the bathroom, or he needed his inhaler. If he was very tired, his brain wouldn't even attempt to wake him up to get to the bathroom, but he would wake up with breathing trouble no matter what, and more often than not, he was in the night terror state. In other words, it was no use trying to talk to him. So, we have given many inhaler and breathing treatments through screams. We always figured, at least he was sucking in big breaths of the medicine.
So last night, close to 11 pm, Jacob abruptly jumped down from his bed and stumbled out to the couch and curled up into a ball. He would not respond to me at all, but he wasn't screaming either. I was getting ready to go to bed, and Heath was already in bed, so I went to get Heath to carry Jacob back to bed, thinking maybe he was just making a sleepy attempt to escape his bed. I stayed in our bedroom, but shortly heard screaming, and came out to find Jacob partially in Heath's arms, both sitting on the floor, and Jacob screaming blood-curdling screams and kicking and writhing. We made the normal attempts to communicate with him, and then sat back to wait it out together, talking in soothing voices and keeping him from kicking hard objects. Eventually I suggested that we try putting him in the bed between us, so that maybe he would know he was safe and calm down. Thankfully, it worked. Or maybe it was just time for the night terror to be over. Near the end, when he was still screaming, I was trying to stroke his hair or arm, and Heath reminded me that it doesn't help, it seems to just irritate him more. Finally, he abruptly stopped screaming. He reached up and tucked his right ear in, like he used to while sucking his binky. Heath and I looked at each other and nodded; it was over for now. In seconds he was conked out in a deep peaceful sleep. I laid next to him and let my arm rest next to his raised arm, next to his chest so I could feel his deep, steady breaths, and we let him stay in our bed for a little while.
I am always struck by how our children being in danger brings out a deep, almost primal love from within us. I know the night terrors are harmless, but seeing his face frozen in an expression of terror with mouth wide open screaming still triggers that response in me. The feelings and the situation itself seem to underscore the nature of my relationship with my firstborn. Tumult cushioned by fierce dedication. Perplexity moderated by deep attachment and delight in exactly who he is.
There has been more drama and emotion in my relationship with him than with my other children, and sometimes I say it's because he is more like me, but I don't really know that that's the case. He wants to be near someone all the time; I need time alone. He still throws violent, unpredictable, lengthy tantrums; I indulged only in milder tantrums typical for young children and outgrew them at a typical age. He has resisted almost every direction I've ever given him; I am very uncomfortable breaking the rules. But still, even when he resists me and pushes my buttons, even when I am most perplexed at his insistent struggle to have complete control over every detail of his own life, his emotions resonate with me. I think maybe it is a suspicion that the only difference between him and I is that I am quietly angry and quietly rebellious and quietly struggling to control every detail of my life, while he is dramatically so. (Yet aren't we all quietly struggling with things like this to some degree?) So, hopefully, as I discover ways to confront my quiet anger and rebellion and desire for control, I can help him deal with his. In the meanwhile, I will fiercely love and protect him.
Sunday, October 26, 2008





